Dealing with chemical shortages for whitefly management – Zara Ludgate

We have received numerous enquiries about whitefly in the last week especially from the MacIntrye and Lower Namoi areas. Shortages of chemicals to control whitefly is currently of major concern to many growers and consultants in this region. Many enquiries also relate to species identification.

Whitefly samples identified from the MacIntyre and Lower Namoi areas have been 100% B biotype (SLW). Parasitism levels recorded from this area are low at this stage (between 0-10% parasitism).

SLW8

Figure 1.  B biotype, Bemisia tabaci   (Photo: R. Lloyd)

Whitefly numbers are building quickly with infestation levels rising rapidly from well below threshold to threshold levels. Rainfall in the next week may assist in reducing population build up by dislodging eggs and nymphs from leaves and slowing development during cooler weather.

Whitefly infestations have put additional pressure on supply of registered insecticides. No new supplies of whitefly insecticides will be available until the week of 8 February 2010. Admiral® will be available on the 8 February and Pegasus® will be available later in February.

So what is the management strategy given the chemical shortage?

For early planted cotton, there will be no Pegasus® available in time to benefit these crops. Therefore, whether infestation levels are in the ‘suppression’ zone in the threshold matrix or the ‘IGR’ zone (see fig. 2) becomes irrelevant because the only option will be an Admiral® application.

Do not use Admiral® too early. One well-timed application of Admiral® will take the crop through to harvest. Going too early risks having to come in with another spray. Only one application of Admiral® is allowed per season under the IRMS.

For growers who already have open cotton and are above threshold, the options are:

1)      Apply Admiral® as soon as it becomes available

2)      Apply a knockdown now and follow up with Admiral® as soon as it becomes available

Provided whitefly infestation levels are not too high, delaying treatment up to 10% open cotton should not result in damage from whitefly. Given the weather forecast for rain and cooler weather in the next few days, consider waiting for Admiral® to become available. This will put you into the 3C zone, ‘IGR + knockdown’, eg Admiral® + Talstar® + PBO.

SLW thresholds7Figure. 2. Threshold Matrix for whitefly management in cotton

In a situation where hot weather is predicted and where cotton fields are looking visibly ‘sticky’, then a knockdown spray followed by Admiral® is suggested. However, a knockdown application will only give around 3 days of relief and will destroy any natural enemies that are working for you.

For later planted cotton, Pegasus® may be available for use against moderate infestations. However, as early cotton is defoliated, late cotton may be subject to mass migration of whitefly from early cotton fields and so Admiral® may again be the best option for control.

Whitefly levels in other regions

Emerald - whitefly were generally at moderate levels and were managed with a Pegasus® application that also targeted mite and aphid infestations. Parasitism levels were high ranging between 45-90% for this area.

St George – whitefly are building up with parasitism levels generally around the 35% level at this stage.

Darling Downs – there are reports of B biotype building up in the west as well as high populations of Greenhouse whitefly in the Brookstead area. Greenhouse whitefly do not cause sticky cotton so always check the identity of the whitefly as part of your management strategy.

Further References

The whitefly threshold matrix and all the information for sampling can be found on the cotton CRC website under ‘Managing silverleaf whitefly’:

http://www.cottoncrc.org.au/content/Industry/Publications/PestsandBeneficials/Whitefly.aspx

Posted in Admiral, Pegasus, Silverleaf whitefly | Leave a comment

Brown stink bugs in cotton – by Moazzem Khan

Brown stink bugs have been reported in some Bollgard® II cotton crops on the Downs. As the season progresses, bug numbers may increase.
 
 

Distinguishing ‘brown’ stink bugs from each other.

 Adults brown stink bugs (Dictyotus caenosus) are shield shaped, matt brown, and smaller than green vegetable bug (GVB), about 7 – 8 mm long (Plate 1). They may be confused with glossy shield bug (Cermatulus nasalis) which is a slightly larger predatory bug, and with rice spotting bug (Eysarcoris distinctus) which is smaller (5 – 6 mm) and has two pale elongated marks on the top (Plate 1). 

 Brown_stinkbug_plate1

 

 

 

 

 

Read More »

Posted in Cotton, Stink bugs | Leave a comment

Managing Helicoverpa softly in vegetative soybeans

soy blog 4 While soybeans are more likely to be attacked by helicoverpa from flowering onwards, severe infestations can occur as early as the seedling stage. In recent years, severe early infestations have been reported on the Downs and in the coastal Burnett with the affected crops experiencing significant yield losses.

 The latest published thresholds for helicoverpa in vegetative soybeans (Rogers and Brier, 2010) show that while soybeans can tolerate damage inflicted by moderate helicoverpa populations up to 7 larvae/m2 without yield loss, severe yield loss is inflicted by populations >7 larvae/m2 at a rate 4-5 times greater than during the pod-fill stage. The conundrum therefore is that while vegetative soybeans are far more tolerant of low to moderate helicoverpa populations (< 7/m2) than podding soybeans, they are markedly less tolerant of populations > 7/m2 than are pod-filling soybeans (see Figure 1). Read More »

Posted in helicoverpa, soybeans | 1 Comment

Chemigation for corn earworm control

corn earwormControl of corn earworm, Helicoverpa armigera, in maize has generally not been practised because of the high cost associated with repeated insecticide application required during silking. In most years it is a case of forsaking the top of every cob to larval damage

However, in some years, very high pest activity results in more severe cob damage, with larvae often tunnelling into the sides of cobs. In such cases grain samples may contain fungus-affected grains and mycotoxins, causing a downgrade in the quality of harvested grain. Read More »

Posted in NPV, helicoverpa | Leave a comment

Mealybugs in cotton

Outbreaks of mealybugs have recently been reported from a number of cotton farms in central Queensland. While mealybugs are considered a minor pest of cotton, they have, on rare occasions, reached minor outbreak levels or ‘hotspots’ in commercial crops in central Queensland. Earlier this year mealybugs were reported causing some problems in Burdekin cotton. Reports from cotton growing areas in Pakistan and India over the last three years indicate that mealybugs have the potential to become a major pest.

mbugs1

  Read More »

Posted in Cotton | Tagged | Leave a comment

Pesky thrips in cotton

C. Mares (CSIRO)

C. Mares (CSIRO)

Just when you thought things were going along pretty well, something else pops out of the woodwork to bring you back down to earth. Some cotton consultants and their grower clients are concerned about the high numbers of thrips in their young cotton seedlings. Are they are problem? Do we need to control them?
Read More »

Posted in Cotton, thrips | Leave a comment

White heads and stem borer in wheat

Every year we receive reports of white heads in wheat, and while there are several possible causes of this symptom, one suspect implicated in the crime is a small stem boring larva called Ephysteris silignitis (Turner) belonging to the moth Family Gelechiidae. Read More »

Posted in Winter cereals | Tagged | 1 Comment

Recce for armyworm in winter cereals

The quick finish for winter cereals this season has resulted in the majority of crops escaping infestations of armyworm. Headers are already into some fields, but there are reports of armyworm making their presence felt in some of the later crops. Read More »

Posted in Winter cereals | Tagged | Leave a comment

Resistance Update on the Road

The Resistance Roadshow visited regional areas during late August and presented the latest resistance monitoring results for a suite of important pests. Presentations covered resistance to conventional insecticides in cotton aphids, mites, silverleaf whitefly and helicoverpa, and helicoverpa resistance to the Bt toxins in Bollgard II. Read More »

Posted in Cotton | Leave a comment

Refresher on managing helicoverpa in chickpea

With the approach of spring, helicoverpa start to become active. In CQ, chickpea crops are attractive to moths, and it is timely to revisit some of the key points related to making decisions about control of this pest in crops.In this article, I wanted to discuss a couple of the recommendations which some growers and agronomists have found a bit challenging. Read More »
Posted in Chickpeas | Tagged | Leave a comment