-
RSS Links
Get The Beat Sheet Newsletter FREE!
Pages
Categories
- Admiral
- aphids
- armyworm
- barley
- Chickpeas
- Cotton
- Events
- General
- Grains
- helicoverpa
- insecticide resistance
- loopers
- mealybugs
- mirids
- mites
- mungbeans
- Natural enemies
- NPV
- Pegasus
- Pulses
- Rutherglen bug
- Silverleaf whitefly
- Sorghum
- Sorghum midge
- soybeans
- Stink bugs
- Sunflower
- thrips
- Uncategorized
- wheat
- whitefly
- Winter cereals
Archived postings
Meta

A better way to make decisions about Helicoverpa control in chickpea
Growers and agronomists are now able to calculate how much yield they will lose if they do not control an infestation of helicoverpa in chickpea. They can calculate the point at which it is economic to control an infestation based on the potential yield loss, their costs of control, the expected grain price and their own preference for benefit:cost.
Being able to calculate the economic thresholds based on an individual grower’s situation is a significant advance on the old recommendations which were fixed at 1-4 larvae per square metre, and did not allow for adjustment when there were changes in grain price or costs of control.
The calculation is now possible following several seasons of research by Melina Miles and Richard Lloyd in Toowoomba, and Paul Grundy and Sherree Short in Biloela. The DPI&F entomologists have worked out that one helicoverpa larva, surviving from hatchling to pupa, will consume 2 grams of chickpea grain. This information is the basis on which potential crop loss ($/ha) is calculated.
The research also examined the impact of spray timing on yield and found that no yield loss occurred when larvae were allowed to feed in vegetative and flowering crops. Yield loss only occurred when larvae fed on developing, filling and maturing Many hours observing larval feeding in the field supported this result. Observations found that larvae of all sizes fed readily on leaves, large larvae did the majority of feeding on pods, and that neither small nor large larvae fed on buds and flowers. However, there are seasons when larval pressure in vegetative and flowering crops may necessitate control.
Grain quality was assessed in both threshold and spray timing trials, and no loss in quality (increase in splits or damaged grain) was seen within the range of densities that it was economic to spray.
In summary, the recommendations for helicoverpa management in chickpea are:
Adjust the number of small larvae for natural loss from disease, predation etc (30% loss)
This research was supported by GRDC and DPI&F.
Get a copy of new Helicoverpa Management in Chickpea brochure from the DPI&F Call Centre, phone 13 25 23. Will soon be downloadable from the web.